Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

WET 219 - Applied Water Law


Twenty elected First Nations councils have signed agreements with Coastal GasLink over its natural gas pipeline, the hereditary clan chiefs maintain that the pipeline has no authority to run 190 kilometers through their traditional territory without their consent.

Two Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision heavy influence on this situation Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia 2014 SCC 44.

This SCC decision is a landmark decision that established Aboriginal land title for the Tsulhqot'in First Nation, with larger effects that may be extended to other situations that are similar in character.

As a result of the landmark decision, provinces cannot unilaterally claim a right to engage in resource-related activities (in this case clear-cut logging) on lands protected by Aboriginal title; they must engage in meaningful consultation with the title-holder before such projects can proceed. The SCC found that although the Aboriginal titleholder does not have to consent to the activity, without meaningful consultation, no infringement of the right can take place. 

The second case, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia [1997] 3 SCR 1010, delivered the first comprehensive account of Aboriginal Title as distinct from Aboriginal Right in Canada. 

Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'n Traditional Territory

This site is maintained by the librarians of Okanagan College Library.
If you wish to comment on an individual page, please contact that page's author.
If you have a question or comment about Okanagan College Library's LibGuides site as a whole, please contact the site administrator.