Peer review is a generic term for a process of self-regulation by a profession or a process of evaluation involving qualified individuals within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards, improve performance and provide credibility. In academia the term is often used to denote a prepublication review of academic papers; reviewing an academic paper is often called refereeing.
a process by which something proposed (as for research or publication) is evaluated by a group of experts in the appropriate field.
CINAHL does record whether or not a publication is peer reviewed. View the full record of a citation to see the Journal Subset field which contains this information.
CINAHL defines peer-review to include the following degrees of review:
Tip! A useful technique is to speed the process of gathering peer reviewed publications is to select Peer Reviewed in the CINAHL advanced search limit options. This way all of the search results will already be filtered to show only publications that are peer reviewed.
Medline (EBSCO): Advanced search limits include peer-reviewed & scholarly articles (but nothing more specific); review articles(but not research in same way that CINAHL does)
PubMed: Most of the journals indexed in PubMed are peer reviewed. However, unlike CINAHL, there is no way to use PubMed to make this distinction for you.
Here are two options for determining if a journal is peer reviewed.
Option A: Find the journal home page and look for specific wording regarding this. This can be found on various pages of the journal website such as the About page.
Option B: Use a periodicals (another term for journals) directory such as Ulrichs international periodicals directory (in print at Kelowna Reference collection PN 4832 .U45 2010.) Note: Ulrichs uses the term 'refereed' instead of 'peer reviewed.'
Sometimes the authors indicate the study type or design in the title of the article.
Example:
Abstract: Look for key phrases such as the following.
"This study examines..."
"The purpose of this study was to..."
"The study's findings support..."
"We investigated..."
"The results of this study confirm..."
Introduction (Background, Objective)
Methodology (Methods)
Results
Analysis (Conclusion)
Discussion
Library bibliographic databases usually identify the publication type of a given article. Type of publication or subject headings can often include the type of research methodology used in the article. NOTE: there is a delay before an article is indexed in a databases, so this may not work with very recent articles.
Example:
Important note: Research articles are the primary means of developing new clinical knowledge, but vary in the level of detail given about the study. You may need to do your own evaluation.
Type of Reference | Pros | Cons | Examples | Evidence-based? |
Websites |
Easy to find Can be very current |
Quality variable | MedlinePlus Child Development Vaccine/Autism |
May lead to evidence-based sources of information in traditional literature it the references. Expert Opinion |
Textbooks |
Quick and easy to use Provides summaries |
Can be expensive Can be slow to update |
The Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice |
May summarize evidence and lead to evidence-based sources of information in the references. Expert Opinion |
Journal Articles | ||||
Reviews (Narrative) | Provide summaries of what is known on specific topics | Methodology used in compiling the summaries may not be scientific or systematic | May lead to evidence-based sources of information in the references. Expert Opinion |
|
Systematic Reviews |
Provide systematically derived summaries of research studies on specific topics |
Addresses a single research question Requires some research to already have been done on the research question |
Factors influencing completion of multi-dose vaccine schedules in adolescents: a systematic review.
|
Evidence-based, secondary research References individual research articles |
Meta-analyses |
Provide systematically derived summaries of research studies on specific topics and applies statistical methods of analyses | Requires considerable amounts of research to have already been done on the specific research question | Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis |
Evidence-based |
Research Reports/Articles |
Describes original research studies and reports on results | Can be time-consuming to read, interpret, and translate into clinical practice | Double-blind, placebo-controlled antibiotic treatment study of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children with chronic abdominal pain |
Evidence-based research |
This site is maintained by the librarians of Okanagan College Library.
If you wish to comment on an individual page, please contact that page's author.
If you have a question or comment about Okanagan College Library's LibGuides site as a whole, please contact the site administrator.